Case 6003441/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ebere Stanley Obilor v Destiney Social Care Provider Ltd Heard by CVP (remote video link) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003441/2025
- Decision date
- 10 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ebere Stanley Obilor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Ebere Stanley Obilor attended the hearing by CVP on 23 June 2025; the respondent did not attend. Employment Judge D N Jones found that Destiney Social Care Provider Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages for September and October 2024, in the sums of £1,465.66 and £748.96 respectively.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the outstanding wages total of £2,214.62. The claimant had also amended the claim to include breach of contract in relation to reimbursement of mileage expenses.
On that amended claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had breached the contract of employment as to that term and ordered damages of £290.50. The overall monetary outcome recorded in the judgment is therefore £2,505.12.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for September and October 2024 in the sums of £1,465.66 and £748.96, totalling £2,214.62. | Upheld | — | £2,215 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant amended the claim to add a breach of contract claim for reimbursement of mileage expenses, and the tribunal found the respondent breached the employment contract in respect of that term. | Upheld | — | £291 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,505
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.