Case 6003465/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Shaw v Quick Reach Powered Access Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003465/2024
- Decision date
- 8 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by letter dated 12 November 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 June 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Batten ordered that the claim be struck out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not state the underlying claim type in the body of the decision; this has been taken from the case listing as unfair dismissal. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 June 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. After a letter dated 12 November 2024 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, the claimant made no sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.