Case 6003486/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs GT Qureshi v Kirklees Council REAL Employment — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003486/2025
- Decision date
- 10 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs GT Qureshi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Leeds on 3 June 2025, Employment Judge T Knowles recorded that Mrs GT Qureshi’s claims of unfair dismissal, indirect disability discrimination, indirect race discrimination and victimisation were dismissed upon their withdrawal. The respondent was represented by Mr J Chapman, solicitor, and the claimant appeared in person.
The judgment states that the withdrawal disposed of those four claims only. It expressly records that the judgment does not affect the claimant’s other claims, which were to proceed to a final hearing.
The written record also notes that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the indirect disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the indirect race discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the victimisation claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.