Case 6003506/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Roberts v Lancastrian Estates (Preston) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003506/2025
- Decision date
- 10 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H Roberts brought a claim for a redundancy payment of £6,300.00 against Lancastrian Estates (Preston) Limited. The parties agreed that £6,300.00 was the correctly calculated redundancy payment. The respondent had already paid £1,676.80 towards that sum, and the tribunal therefore considered the balance outstanding.
The tribunal recorded that, at termination, there had also been a dispute about notice pay. The claimant had received £22,326.90 in respect of notice pay, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. The respondent later sought a tax refund from HMRC by retrospectively apportioning £6,300.00 of the notice pay as redundancy pay, and then passed £1,676.80 to the claimant.
The respondent did not attend the hearing. The claimant asked for a judgment for the remaining £4,623.20. The tribunal accepted the claimant's position that it was not open to the respondent unilaterally to re-classify notice pay already paid as redundancy pay, and it was not prepared to infer what the respondent's case would have been in opposition.
Judgment was entered for the claimant in the sum of £4,623.20 as the balance of the redundancy payment. The written notice also set out the tribunal interest information, including that the relevant decision day was 10 July 2025 and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum, but no separate interest sum was awarded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant brought a redundancy payment claim in the sum of £6,300.00. The tribunal found he was entitled to that redundancy payment, but because £1,676.80 had already been paid, it awarded the balance only. | Upheld | — | £4,623 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,623
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.