Case 6003540/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Daniels v Secret Garden Cafe (Hull) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003540/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Daniels
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 09 June 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in April 2024 and May 2024 and failed to pay holiday entitlement. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross amount of £1,518.64, and the hearing listed for 16 December 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that unauthorised deductions were made from wages in April 2024 and May 2024, but does not split the gross award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement, but does not split the gross award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,519
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.