Case 6003542/2024 · Employment Tribunal
David Sherry v East London Bus & Coach Company Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6003542/2024
- Decision date
- 16 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Members
- Venue
- East London
- Panel members
- Mrs B K Saund, Mr J Webb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
David Sherry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints against East London Bus & Coach Company Ltd for unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and victimisation.
The tribunal recorded that all three complaints were not well-founded and dismissed them. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint stated as unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. Written reasons were not provided in the judgment text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint stated as failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. Written reasons were not provided in the judgment text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Written reasons were not provided in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.