Case 6003579/2024 · Employment Tribunal
F Smith v SBFM Limited HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003579/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
F Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 27 November 2024 before Employment Judge Slater. The claimant, F Smith, did not attend. The respondent, SBFM Limited, was represented by Mr S Pybus, HR Business Partner.
The tribunal dismissed the claim in accordance with rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because of the claimant's non-attendance. The judgment does not contain substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dismissed in accordance with rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The judgment does not set out separate substantive findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed in accordance with rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The judgment does not set out separate substantive findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.