Case 6003599/2025 · Employment Tribunal
P Garcia v Ignite Group Services Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003599/2025
- Decision date
- 18 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
3 namedClaimant
P Garcia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 3 February 2025. Because the respondents did not present a valid response on time, the Employment Judge said a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The tribunal found that Ignite Group Services Limited was the claimant's correct employer and dismissed the claim against Justizia Technologies Limited.
On the substantive claims, the tribunal found a breach of contract in respect of notice for October 2024 and awarded gross damages of £7,083.33. It also found that the respondent had breached the contract of employment by failing to pay the relevant pension scheme the employee contributions deducted from the claimant's pay, and awarded £1,027.32 gross on that head.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was found to be well-founded because the respondent had not paid the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended, and a further gross award of £2,778.82 was made. The total award was £10,889.47 gross, and the judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax liabilities arising if the gross awards are paid without deduction at source.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded in respect of holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £2,779 |
| Other | The claim against Justizia Technologies Limited was dismissed because Ignite Group Services Limited was found to be the correct employer. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for notice pay for October 2024. | Upheld | — | £7,083 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for failure to pay the relevant pension scheme the employee contributions deducted from the claimant's pay. | Upheld | — | £1,027 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,889
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.