Case 6003602/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Frederico Masi v Kitchen G Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003602/2024
- Decision date
- 18 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Frederico Masi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge N Wilson sat in public by video on 18 March 2025 and heard Frederico Masi’s claims against Kitchen G Limited. The tribunal upheld the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay, finding that the respondent did not pay part of the claimant’s notice period which he worked.
The tribunal also upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent did not pay the claimant’s wages for March 2024, and that this included a period of notice. The judgment records no separate split between the two claims for the monetary award.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,916.67 gross, described as the gross sum unpaid. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and National Insurance due on that gross payment. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the notice pay complaint well founded because the respondent did not pay part of the claimant’s notice period which he worked. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint well founded because the respondent did not pay wages for March 2024, including a period of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,917
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.