Case 6003613/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Hampson v Advanced Accessories Limited t/a Mr Mobile — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003613/2024
- Decision date
- 28 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Hampson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal found in the claimant's favour on each of the three monetary claims advanced.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in February 2024 (£230.72 gross), had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice (£692.31 gross, representing one week's statutory notice calculated on gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax as Post Employment Notice Pay), and had failed to pay accrued untaken annual leave entitlement (£415.38 gross, being 3 days at £138.46 per day).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total gross sum of £1,338.41, and the listed hearing on 14 October 2024 was cancelled. A notice regarding interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, with the relevant decision day stated as 28 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in February 2024. | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; 1 week's statutory notice calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued untaken annual leave: 3 days at £138.46 per day. | Upheld | — | £415 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,338
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.