Case 6003648/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Koncar v South West Leisure Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003648/2024
- Decision date
- 5 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Koncar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central on 25 October 2024 before Employment Judge Brewer. Mr M Koncar appeared in person and South West Leisure Limited was represented by Ms K Rogers, Payroll Manager.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for redundancy pay, arrears of pay, and holiday pay. No monetary award is recorded for those claims in the judgment text provided.
The claim for notice pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay 4 weeks' notice pay, but the extracted judgment does not state a quantified sum for that award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for arrears of pay and says it fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claim for notice pay succeeds and that the respondent shall pay 4 weeks' notice pay, but no monetary figure is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.