Case 6003694/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Seymour v Elite Cars (Wales) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003694/2025
- Decision date
- 3 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Seymour
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 3 February 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made on the claim or part of it.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£1,040.00 gross), that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice (damages of £6,240.00), that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £14,300.00, and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement (£1,196.00).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £22,776.00 in total, with the claimant responsible for any tax and employee national insurance contributions due. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Harfield dated 11 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 3 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £1,040.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £6,240.00 awarded. | Upheld | — | £6,240 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy; statutory redundancy payment of £14,300.00 awarded. | Upheld | — | £14,300 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement; £1,196.00 awarded. Listed by gov.uk under Working Time Regulations; tagged as holiday_pay to reflect the substance of the award. | Upheld | — | £1,196 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,776
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.