Case 6003706/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Ansa-Asamoah v Bestway Panacea Holdings Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6003706/2025
- Decision date
- 8 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Appearances For
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Ansa-Asamoah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing determined whether Mrs G Ansa-Asamoah had sufficient continuous service to pursue her unfair dismissal claim. She worked for Bestway Panacea Holdings Limited under a zero-hours verbal arrangement on six dates between 26 October and 3 November 2022. The Tribunal found that this contract ended in November 2022 and that she entered a new permanent contract beginning on 13 March 2023, which recorded that date as the start of her continuous employment.
The Tribunal found that none of the statutory exceptions in section 212(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 preserved continuity during the intervening period. The delay in restarting work resulted from queries concerning the claimant's right-to-work documentation, rather than incapacity caused by sickness; there was no temporary cessation of work; and the parties' correspondence concerned entry into a new permanent contract. Her continuous employment therefore ran from 13 March 2023 until her dismissal on 20 November 2023.
Because the claimant had not completed the two years' continuous employment required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim without determining its merits. No monetary remedy was awarded or considered in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment. The merits of the dismissal were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 210(5) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 212(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Pearson v Kent County Council [1993] IRLR 165 (CA)
- Scarlett v Godfrey Abbott Group Ltd [1978] ICR 1106 (EAT)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.