Case 6003707/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Florescu v Horizon Force Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003707/2024
- Decision date
- 9 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Florescu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Florescu presented a claim against Horizon Force Ltd on 11 June 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Victoria Butler determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered Horizon Force Ltd to pay £420 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £170 for that element. The judgment recorded a total sum payable of £590.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and was ordered to pay £420 gross. | Upheld | — | £420 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £170. | Upheld | — | £170 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £590
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.