Case 6003725/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H C A Leung v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003725/2024
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Cadney Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H C A Leung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a prison officer and suffered a head injury at work on 3 December 2023, leading to post-concussion syndrome and sickness absence. She brought disability discrimination claims alleging discrimination arising from disability in relation to her dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments by allowing recovery time, a phased return, or redeployment to non-operational duties.
The respondent accepted that the claimant's post-concussion syndrome had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities between 3 December 2023 and 8 April 2024. The issue was whether the effect was long term within the meaning of s6 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal assessed that question as at the date of the alleged discrimination and did not take account of later developments.
The tribunal found that, although the claimant's symptoms had in fact continued for more than 12 months by the hearing date, the evidence available by 8 April 2024 did not support a conclusion that the impairment was likely to last 12 months or more. The medical evidence at the relevant time anticipated recovery within weeks or a few months. The claimant was therefore not a disabled person at the material times, and the disability discrimination claims were dismissed. The separate race discrimination claims in case 6004247/2024 were not determined and were directed to proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability under s15 Equality Act 2010 dismissed because the claimant was found not to be a disabled person at the material times. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under s20/21 Equality Act 2010 dismissed because the claimant was found not to be a disabled person at the material times. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office [1999] ICR 302
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] ICR 1052
- College of Ripon and York St John v Hobbs [2002] IRLR 185
- s212(2) Equality Act 2010
- Aderimi v London and South Eastern Railway Ltd
- Igweike v TSB Bank Plc [2020] IRLR 267
- All Answers Ltd v W [2021] EWCA Civ 606
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle [2009] UKHL 37
- could well happen
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.