Case 6003780/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Babar v Jannah Cash & Carry Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003780/2024
- Decision date
- 5 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Babar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after finding that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. It proceeded to determine the claim in the respondent’s absence and made awards on the papers. The hearing listed for 13 December 2024 was cancelled.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It accepted the calculation for unpaid wages from 12 November 2023 to 10 January 2024 at 494 hours x £10.42 per hour, giving £5,147.48, and then deducted £1,100 already received, leaving £4,047.48.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract. It awarded £771.08 for one week’s statutory notice, calculated on 74 hours at £10.42 per hour. The judgment records that this was assessed using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and awarded £590.81, based on 56.7 hours at £10.42 per hour.
The total gross sum ordered was £5,409.37. The judgment also included the standard Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 notice stating that interest would be payable if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, but it did not quantify any interest figure in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It awarded the claimant £4,047.48, calculated from unpaid wages for 12/11/2023 to 10/1/2024: 494 hours at £10.42 per hour (£5,147.48) less £1,100 received. | Upheld | — | £4,047 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £771.08 for one week’s statutory notice, calculated as 74 hours at £10.42 per hour. The judgment states the sum was calculated using gross pay because of the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £771 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and awarded £590.81, calculated as 56.7 hours at £10.42 per hour. | Upheld | — | £591 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,409
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.