Case 6003802/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Chukwuma v AyiTess Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003802/2024
- Decision date
- 7 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Chukwuma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 12 June 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024.
On that basis, the tribunal found that AyiTess Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr C Chukwuma's wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay the claimant £1,125 gross.
No other claims, legal tests, or separate remedy components are recorded in the judgment. The decision is signed by Employment Judge Miller Date on 7 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal made a Rule 22 determination and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,125
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.