Case 6003805/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Walton v BMGR Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003805/2025
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Walton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Byrne at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 26 June 2025. The Respondent did not attend or take part, and the judgment notes that an order had been made on 16 March 2025 under Rule 22(2) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 before the full-merits hearing proceeded.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. It found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages in the net amount of £2,405.26.
The tribunal ordered that the grand total sum of £2,405.26 be paid to the Claimant forthwith. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons will be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages in the net amount of £2,405.26. | Upheld | — | £2,405 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,405
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.