Case 6003808/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Koroveshi v Sussex Air Conditioning & Heat Pumps Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003808/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen Judgment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Koroveshi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 7 March 2025, Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen recorded that the claimant, Mr J Koroveshi, confirmed the employment dates provided by the respondent were correct and that he had not been employed for two years. In light of that position, he withdrew his complaints of unfair dismissal and failure to pay a redundancy payment.
The tribunal therefore dismissed both of those complaints on withdrawal. No monetary award was made in relation to either claim.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claims stayed listed for hearing on 15, 16 and 17 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | At the preliminary hearing on 7 March 2025, the claimant confirmed the respondent's employment dates were correct and that he had not been employed for two years. He then withdrew this complaint, and the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | At the preliminary hearing on 7 March 2025, the claimant withdrew this complaint after confirming he had not been employed for two years. The tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.