Case 6003835/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003835/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms J Cohen, Mr S Hearn
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central before Employment Judge Glennie with Ms J Cohen and Mr S Hearn, gave a unanimous judgment on 6 June 2025. The claimant was represented in person and the respondent by counsel, Mr K McNerney.
The tribunal recorded that the complaint of disability discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. It also dismissed the complaints of unfair dismissal and failure to pay holiday pay.
No separate remedy was recorded in the judgment, and no monetary award was made. The short-form judgment does not set out additional factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the stated outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records: 'The complaint of disability discrimination is dismissed on withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as a 'failure to pay holiday pay' complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.