Case 6003863/2025 · Employment Tribunal
E Griffiths v IKEA Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6003863/2025
- Decision date
- 27 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrison Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Watford Employment Tribunal, sitting by CVP before Employment Judge Harrison on 26 and 27 March 2026, determined E Griffiths' claim against IKEA Ltd. The written judgment records one adjudicated claim: unfair dismissal.
The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. The judgment states that this means the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant.
No monetary remedy, award, interest, or other remedy is recorded in the written judgment. The written record states that full reasons were given orally at the hearing and that full written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant. Full reasons were given orally and are not set out in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.