Case 6004030/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Flowers v Leisure Box Fitness Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004030/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Flowers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Flowers brought a claim for unpaid wages said to relate to work as a personal trainer between 2 November 2023 and 30 November 2023. He said the gym closed and he was not paid for work already done. The respondent entered creditors voluntary liquidation on 22 February 2024. Both parties did not attend the final hearing, and no explanation was given by the claimant for his non-attendance.
The tribunal found that the claim was governed by the strict time limit in section 23 ERA 1996. ACAS Early Conciliation ran from 2 February 2024 to 15 March 2024, so the limitation period was extended, but the tribunal calculated that the claim should still have been presented by 14 April 2024. The proceedings were not issued until 17 June 2024, which was over two months late.
The tribunal considered whether the delay could be excused on the basis that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. It noted that the claimant’s ET1 stated that he had obtained another job on 12 May 2024, paying £12,000 per annum, which indicated that he had been able to take steps to find work before the claim was issued. In the absence of any evidence from the claimant explaining the delay, the tribunal was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the proceedings by 14 May 2024.
As a result, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to make any award for unpaid wages and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim on its merits: the claim was presented out of time under section 23 ERA 1996 and the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the extended limitation period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- ACAS Early Conciliation extension
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.