Case 6004039/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Clark v Portsmouth Hospitals University Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004039/2024
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Salter Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Clark brought disability discrimination complaints against Portsmouth Hospitals University Trust. The case was heard at Southampton Employment Tribunal on 19 September 2025 before Employment Judge Salter, sitting alone.
The tribunal decided that the complaints were presented out of time and were not presented within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. On that basis, the disability discrimination complaints were dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 13 October 2025. Written reasons were not separately provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of disability discrimination were presented out of time and were not presented within such further period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.