Case 6004058/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S. Christiano v Tailormade Kitchens and Bedrooms Ltd. — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004058/2024
- Decision date
- 19 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. S. Christiano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr S. Christiano’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The respondent admitted that the deductions listed in the judgment were outstanding, and the parties agreed the calculations. The tribunal ordered payment of £2,875.00 gross for salary due for April 2024 and £6,938.43 gross for commission due on sales between October 2023 and March 2024.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement on termination. It ordered payment of £125.00 gross for 1 day of untaken holiday outstanding at the end of employment.
The judgment records no separate compensation award beyond these wage and holiday payments. It also includes the standard notice on interest, stating that interest may become payable if the sums are not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, which was 19 November 2024, but no interest sum was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well-founded. This covered unpaid salary for April 2024 (£2,875.00 gross) and unpaid commission due on sales between October 2023 and March 2024 (£6,938.43 gross); the respondent admitted those deductions were outstanding and the calculations were agreed. | Upheld | — | £9,813 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay 1 day of untaken holiday outstanding on termination of employment and ordered payment of £125.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,938
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.