Case 6004072/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Semerdzhieva v 3rd Place Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004072/2024
- Decision date
- 21 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedMiss P Semerdzhieva
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHearing in Manchester before Employment Judge Leach over two days. The claimant succeeded on her unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal complaints; the holiday pay sum was agreed by the respondent. The unauthorised deductions claim and the failure-to-provide-written-reasons claim were dismissed. Direct and indirect sex discrimination claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
On wrongful dismissal, the claimant was dismissed on 22 January 2024 and fully mitigated her loss from 18 February 2024, so the claim was limited to 4 weeks' loss at the agreed gross rate of £131.53 per week. The judgment records the wrongful dismissal award as £512.12. On unfair dismissal, the agreed basic award was £1,315.30 (10 complete years of service x £131.53), plus a compensatory award of £500 for loss of statutory rights only.
The holiday pay sum of £123.40 (gross) was agreed. The total amount the respondent was ordered to pay was £2,450.82. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not produced.
Claims and outcomes
6 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £1,815 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Upheld | — | £512 |
| Sex discrimination | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £123 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,451
- Basic award
- £1,315
- Compensatory award
- £500
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.