Case 6004095/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MF Qudeer v Sky Retail Stores Ltd HELD AT: Liverpool (by CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004095/2024
- Decision date
- 3 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr MF Qudeer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr MF Qudeer's unfair dismissal complaint was received on 18 June 2024. The Tribunal held that the effective date of termination was 29 January 2024, so the claim was not presented within the 3-month period ending on 28 April 2024.
The Tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the complaint within that time limit, and that it was not then presented within such further period as the Tribunal considered reasonable. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaint and dismissed it. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was presented on 18 June 2024, after the 3-month time limit running from the effective date of termination on 29 January 2024. The Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the complaint within that period and that it was not presented within any further reasonable period, so the Tribunal had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.