Case 6004103/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J. Worthington v Believe Achieve CIC — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004103/2024
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach. Representatives
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J. Worthington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J. Worthington did not attend the final hearing at Manchester on 8 August 2025. The respondent, Believe Achieve CIC, was represented by Miss J. Scarborough-Lang, Litigation Consultant.
The tribunal stated that the claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The written record does not set out any findings on the underlying merits of the claim or identify any monetary award.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Leach and sent to the parties on 24 September 2025. The note at the end states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant did not attend the final hearing on 8 August 2025, and the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The judgment text does not state any substantive findings on liability. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.