Case 6004135/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Moses v Visto Help Hands Care — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004135/2024
- Decision date
- 3 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Moses
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 24 December 2024, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Order of 10 December 2024. The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Lancaster therefore struck out the response. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify any substantive claim by type. It records only that the response was struck out for failure to comply with the Order of 10 December 2024 and failure to make sufficient representations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.