Case 6004147/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Avdyl Zeqiri v Master Skills Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004147/2025
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Avdyl Zeqiri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The Respondent did not present any response to the claim and did not appear or have representation at the hearing on 1 July 2025 before Employment Judge Crosfill at East London Tribunal Hearing Centre (by CVP). The Claimant gave evidence in person confirming the contents of his ET1 was true.
The Tribunal found the claim well founded. The Claimant was entitled to an hourly rate of £23.00 and worked from 18 to 22 November 2024 between 8am and 6pm with an unpaid 30 minute break, totalling 47.5 hours (5 days x 9.5 hours). The Respondent unlawfully deducted the resulting sum of £1,092.50 from wages due on Friday 22 November 2024.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £1,092.50.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award of £1,092.50 rounded to nearest pound. Calculated as 47.5 hours x £23.00 hourly rate for work between 18-22 November 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,093 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,093
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.