Karl Hall v Synergy Associates Ltd — 2026

Case reference: 6004200/2025
Decision date: 13 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge G. King Representation

Indexed: 26 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Karl Hall

Respondent

Synergy Associates Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Karl Hall brought claims against Synergy Associates Ltd for unfair dismissal, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, and unlawful deductions from wages. Employment Judge G. King held that all three claims had been submitted out of time and that the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them.

The claims were therefore dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award or other remedy, and written summary reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed because the claim was submitted out of time and the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear it.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The notice pay claim was dismissed because it was submitted out of time and the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear it.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Dismissed because the claim was submitted out of time and the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear it.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.