Case 6004203/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs V Thanki v Commercial Trust Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004203/2025
- Decision date
- 16 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Russell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs V Thanki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by consent, the respondent's name was changed to Commercial Trust Limited.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. The complaint of discrimination on grounds of pregnancy or maternity was also dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time.
The claim was dismissed in its entirety. The written judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.