Case 6004215/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jonathan Hogarth v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004215/2025
- Decision date
- 23 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jonathan Hogarth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Jonathan Hogarth's disability discrimination claims against the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs from 20 to 23 July 2026. It found that the claims under sections 13, 15 and 20-21 of the Equality Act 2010 were not well-founded and dismissed them.
Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not set out findings of fact or further reasons for the dismissals, and it records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under sections 20-21 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- ss.20-21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.