Case 6004232/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Connor solicitor. For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004232/2024
- Decision date
- 24 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr K Connor solicitor. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a final hearing held by CVP in Nottingham on 24 October 2024 before Employment Judge R Clark sitting alone, the claimant Mrs Leanne Howard was represented by Mr K Connor, solicitor; neither respondent attended or was represented. The tribunal adjudicated claims brought against Chase Style Limited (the first respondent) and Dotty and Doris Limited (the second respondent).
Against the first respondent, the tribunal dismissed the claim of breach of contract (notice), upheld the claim of failure to provide itemised pay statements (ordering no separate remedy beyond the declaration), and upheld the claim of unfair dismissal. Compensation against the first respondent was ordered in the total sum of £6,939.40, comprising a basic award of £4,671 and a compensatory award of £2,268.40. The recoupment provisions were stated not to apply.
The tribunal recorded that there was no claim before it concerning the handling of pension contributions; to the extent any such claim might have existed, it was withdrawn to be pursued elsewhere and accordingly was not dismissed. All claims against the second respondent, Dotty & Doris Limited, failed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract (notice) claim against the first respondent, Chase Style Limited, failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements against the first respondent, Chase Style Limited, succeeded. No separate remedy ordered beyond the declaration. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal claim against the first respondent, Chase Style Limited, succeeded. Compensation of £6,939.40 comprising basic award £4,671 and compensatory award £2,268.40. Recoupment provisions do not apply. | Upheld | — | £6,939 |
| Unfair dismissal | Claims against the second respondent, Dotty & Doris Limited, failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claims against the second respondent, Dotty & Doris Limited, failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claims against the second respondent, Dotty & Doris Limited (including failure to provide itemised pay statements), failed and were dismissed. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,939
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,671
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,268
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.