Case 6004234/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Chaudhary First v Wincanton Group Limited Second Respondent: Wincanton UK Limited Third Respondent: Wincanton UK — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004234/2024
- Decision date
- 15 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Chaudhary First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Fearon sitting alone on 1 April 2025. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by Ms Zielinska, counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued by the claimant. The judgment is confined to that strike-out decision and does not contain any merits findings on the underlying dispute.
No remedy was awarded. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that 'the claimant’s claim is struck out' under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.