Case 6004326/2024 · Employment Tribunal
L Praill v The Grange Golf Club Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004326/2024
- Decision date
- 6 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Praill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a response. The Employment Judge was satisfied that the claim had come to the respondent company's attention because it was served at its registered office, and substituted The Grange Golf Club Limited as the correctly named respondent under rule 34. The hearing listed for 11 November 2024 was cancelled.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in relation to quarterly bonus payments due in December 2023 and March 2024. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £2,500 in respect of that claim. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £518.46 for that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to quarterly bonus payments due in December 2023 and March 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £518 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,018
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.