Case 6004330/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Thompson v Fortius Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004330/2024
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 12 May 2025, the claimant did not attend and was not represented. Employment Judge Dawson recorded that the claimant had been notified of the hearing and had not complied with earlier tribunal orders, including the unless order made on 12 March 2025 requiring medical documents to be sent to the respondent by 30 April 2025. On that basis, the tribunal treated the disability discrimination claim as struck out without further order.
The respondent also applied on 2 May 2025 to strike out the unfair dismissal claim, relying on no reasonable prospect of success and, alternatively, that the claim was not being actively pursued. The tribunal did not determine the merits or the no reasonable prospect limb; it struck the claim out because the claimant was not actively pursuing it, in light of his failure to attend both the 12 May 2025 hearing and the earlier hearing, and his lack of contact with the tribunal since 12 March 2025.
The reasons section also states that the claimant's remaining claims were struck out. The judgment does not separately name those remaining claims, but the case listing identifies breach of contract alongside unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Struck out pursuant to Employment Judge Bradford's order dated 12 March 2025 after non-compliance with an unless order requiring medical documents to be sent by 30 April 2025. The reasons section records a previous order dated 27 November 2025, which appears inconsistent with the May 2025 hearing chronology in the text. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent applied on 2 May 2025 to strike out this claim on the grounds of no reasonable prospect of success and, alternatively, that it was not being actively pursued. The tribunal struck it out on the basis that it was not being actively pursued and did not decide the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to the claimant's 'remaining claims' being struck out but does not separately identify this claim; the case listing identifies breach of contract as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- not actively pursuing
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.