Case 6004342/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Allen v Exmoor Lifts Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004342/2025
- Decision date
- 2 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment under rule 64 issued by Employment Judge Bax following a hearing at Bristol by CVP on 2 March 2026. The claimant Mr L Allen appeared in person and the respondent Exmoor Lifts Limited was represented by its managing director Ms M Jezzard.
The tribunal recorded by consent that the claim of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and that the respondent shall pay the claimant £1,046.75 gross. The tribunal also recorded by consent that the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday was well founded and that the respondent shall pay the claimant £210.81 gross.
The respondent was ordered to pay a total of £1,257.56 gross. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Bax and sent to the parties on 7 March 2026.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment under rule 64. Award of £1,046.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,047 |
| Holiday pay | Consent judgment under rule 64. Award of £210.81 gross for accrued but unpaid holiday. | Upheld | — | £211 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,258
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.