Case 6004356/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Stevens v Methodist Homes — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004356/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Stevens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claimant's claim against Methodist Homes under rule 37. By a letter dated 20 November 2024, the Tribunal gave Ms N Stevens an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The hearing listed for 15 January 2025 was cancelled as a result.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits of the underlying claim, nor any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing category and the single-claim tribunal form of the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.