Case 6004361/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bell v Yusuf Ozdemir — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004361/2024
- Decision date
- 3 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under Rule 22 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. On that basis, Employment Judge Johnson determined the claim on the papers and entered judgment against Yusuf Ozdemir.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,200 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £300 as statutory notice pay, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable on post-employment notice pay.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered £400 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £300, calculated at 0.5 week’s pay for each complete year of service when the claimant was aged 22 years or under.
The total award was £2,200. The written record also gave the standard interest notice: no interest is payable if the sum is paid in full within 14 days after the decision was sent to the parties, interest starts the following day, and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as statutory notice pay of 1 week, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment calculated as 0.5 week’s pay for every complete year of service when the claimant was aged 22 years or under. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.