Case 6004373/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Woolf v N C Cammack & Son Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004373/2025
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Woolf
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal determined that the claimant had brought his application for interim relief more than 7 calendar days immediately following the date of dismissal. Under section 128(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the application.
The claimant agreed that the claim before the Tribunal was expressly limited to interim relief and did not include any claim for unfair dismissal or for wages or holiday pay. He consented to the interim relief claim being dismissed, and the judgment stated that this dismissal was not intended to act as a procedural bar to further claims other than interim relief.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment determined only an application for interim relief. The claimant agreed the claim was expressly limited to interim relief and did not include unfair dismissal or wages/holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 128(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.