Case 6004395/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Singh v Jliral Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004395/2025
- Decision date
- 28 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 10 February 2025. The judgment records that the respondent, Jliral Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and that the Employment Judge could properly make a determination under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds. It does not set out the individual causes of action or make separate findings on liability for each claim head in the extracted text.
Remedy was not determined in the liability judgment. The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be decided at a later Remedy Hearing. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Adkinson on 28 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim succeeds under rule 22 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. No individual claim heads or liability findings are specified in the extracted text, and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.