Case 6004427/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Adom v Marks and Spencer plc Heard: by CVP at London Central — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004427/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Adom
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP at London Central on 22 October 2025 before Employment Judge Codd, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38.
The tribunal gave two reasons for strike out: the claimant had not complied with multiple Tribunal Orders, and the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. No substantive findings on the merits of any underlying claim are set out in the judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It records only that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38 for non-compliance with multiple Tribunal Orders and because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.