Case 6004431/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Baker v Marcon Fit-Out Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004431/2024
- Decision date
- 28 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal via CVP on 28 October 2024 before Employment Judge Jeram. The claimant, Mr W Baker, did not attend. The respondent, Marcon Fit-Out Ltd, was represented by Mr D Regan, Finance Director.
The tribunal stated in one judgment that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and unauthorised deduction from wages were not well founded and were dismissed. No further substantive findings or remedy award were recorded in the written decision.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the written record. The published record therefore contains only the dismissal outcomes and no detailed reasoning or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.