Case 6004514/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Warbrick v Rouse Landscape & Civils Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004514/2024
- Decision date
- 21 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Warbrick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 after notice had been sent, HMCTS attempted to contact the respondent, and the start of the hearing was delayed. The response form was treated as written representations and disputed that there was any contractual relationship or employment relationship.
The claimant gave sworn evidence and provided a wage slip and P45 in the respondent company's name. The Tribunal was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the claimant was an employee of the respondent, that the claim was within time, that ACAS early conciliation requirements had been met, and that the final wages shown on the payslip had not been paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the complaint as unauthorised deductions from wages and finds it well-founded in respect of the claimant's final month of employment in April 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,248 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,248
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.