Case 6004523/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Phillips v Creative Republic of Cardiff Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004523/2025
- Decision date
- 27 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Webb Representation
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the CVP hearing and, because there was no application for postponement and no good reason for absence, the tribunal proceeded in their absence. The claimant's application to amend the ET1 to add unfair dismissal was refused because it had not been set out in the original claim, it was reasonably practicable to raise it earlier, and the balance of prejudice favoured refusal.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deduction of wages under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that the claimant was not paid for work between 11 November and 22 November 2024 and ordered the respondent to pay £752.00 gross. The claimant was responsible for tax and National Insurance on that sum.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for holiday accrued but not taken under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found that the claimant's leave year began on 1 January 2024, that he accrued leave at 2.33 days per month, and that he had not taken annual leave before the relationship ended on 22 November 2024. On the figures it accepted, it calculated 7 days accrued in the period to 31 March 2024 and 18.6 days in the period from 1 April 2024 to 22 November 2024, producing a gross award of £2,340.74, again subject to tax and National Insurance being paid by the claimant.
The tribunal further upheld the breach of contract claim and awarded £532.50 in damages. It also found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a pay statement and that unnotified deductions were made, awarding a further £83.51. The total amount awarded across all claims was £3,708.25.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was not paid for work between 11 November and 22 November 2024 and ordered payment of £752.00 gross, with tax and National Insurance to be borne by the claimant. | Upheld | — | £752 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday accrued but not taken under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It held that the claimant's leave year began on 1 January 2024, that he accrued leave at 2.33 days per month, and that he was entitled to 25.6 days at the end of the relationship. | Upheld | — | £2,341 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the claim for damages for breach of contract was made out and awarded £532.50. | Upheld | — | £533 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a pay statement and that unnotified deductions were made. The extracted text does not specify a separate statutory label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £84 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,708
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.