Case 6004548/2025 · Employment Tribunal
K Clarke v G & L Milkshakes LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004548/2025
- Decision date
- 30 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in respect of unpaid statutory maternity pay, and that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, and that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £5,960.16, comprising £924.66 unpaid statutory maternity pay, £2,250 notice damages, £985.50 holiday pay, and £1,800 redundancy pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid statutory maternity pay of £924.66. | Upheld | — | £925 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice (£225 x 10 weeks' statutory notice), calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £2,250 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday entitlement of £985.50 (73 hours x £13.50 per hour). | Upheld | — | £986 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £1,800 (4 x 0.5 x £225 + 6 x 1 x £225). | Upheld | — | £1,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,960
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.