Case 6004555/2025 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v No Attendnance — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004555/2025
- Decision date
- 28 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Swansea Civil Justice Centre before Employment Judge S Povey, found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was made out and succeeded. It also found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was made out and succeeded. The claimant, Doreen Davies, appeared in person and there was no attendance for the respondent.
The judgment records the monetary outcome as a total payment of £9,297.36. That figure comprised a basic award of £7,138.56, calculated as 16 x £446.16, a compensatory award of £500.00 described as loss of statutory rights, and £1,658.80 for unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,639 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,659 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,297
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,139
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.