Case 6004594/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Tate v Happy Drinks Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004594/2025
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Tate
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 7 October 2025 before Employment Judge Barker. The claimant, Ms P Tate, did not attend. The respondent, Happy Drinks Group Ltd, attended through Mr Oprey, Head of Finance and Operations.
The judgment states that the claim was dismissed because of the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing. It does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not set out the substantive pleaded issues; it records dismissal because the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | This entry reflects the listed Right To Be Accompanied issue from the case context. The judgment itself does not analyse the claim and dismisses the case for non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not determine the merits of the unfair dismissal claim; it dismisses the claim because of the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.