Case 6004619/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S. Mahmood v Sovereign Network Group Sovereign Housing Association Limited Iain Mackrory-Jamieson Claudia Araujo — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004619/2024
- Decision date
- 7 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S. Mahmood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Bristol Employment Tribunal via CVP on 19 July 2024 before Employment Judge G. King. The written judgment records that the Claimant, Ms S. Mahmood, appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Mrs J. Headford.
The only substantive decision recorded in the written record is that the Claimant's application for interim relief was dismissed. No monetary award was made. The document does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the text provided, and it does not set out any detailed reasons for the dismissal.
The record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure. The judgment was sent to the parties on 7 August 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record only states that the Claimant's application for interim relief was dismissed. It does not identify the substantive underlying claim type in the text supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.