Case 6004692/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hutson v Arrow Cycles Limited (in liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004692/2024
- Decision date
- 18 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Hutson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Nottingham before Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone on 16 September 2024, dismissed the Claimant's holiday pay and arrears of pay claims because they had been submitted out of time. The judgment states that the Tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear those claims.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claim for a redundancy payment. It found that Mr Hutson was not an employee of Arrow Cycles Limited (in liquidation), so the redundancy payment claim was not well-founded.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing and no further written reasons were provided. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the holiday pay claim was submitted out of time and the Tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the arrears of pay claim was submitted out of time and the Tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the Claimant was found not to be an employee of the first Respondent, so the redundancy payment claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.